Hoppers of North Carolina:
Spittlebugs, Leafhoppers, Treehoppers, and Planthoppers
Scientific Name: Search Common Name:
Family (Alpha):
« »
CICADELLIDAE Members: NC Records

Chlorotettix unidentified species - No Common Name


No image for this species.
Taxonomy
Family: CICADELLIDAESubfamily: DeltocephalinaeTribe: Pendarini
Identification
Online Photographs: BugGuide, GBIF  iNaturalist                                                                                  
Description: Chlorotettix is a notriously difficult genus to identify to species visually; a majority of the species are various shade of yellow and green, and they can only be reliably distinguished by looking at genital features. Therefore, it is very important for all Chlorotettix species other than necopinus and tergatus to obtain a picture of the underside. This page acts as a home for all Chlorotettix that cannot be identified based on visual characters alone, pictures that do not show the underside and therefore male or female characteristics.
Distribution in North Carolina
County Map: Clicking on a county returns the records for the species in that county.
Distribution: North America
Abundance: Across the state.
Seasonal Occurrence
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Habitats and Life History
Habitats:
Plant Associates:
Behavior: Can be attracted at night with a light.
Comment:
Status: Native
Global and State Rank:

Species Photo Gallery for Chlorotettix unidentified species No Common Name

Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Erich Hofmann, David George, Rich Teper, Jeff Niznik
New Hanover Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Erich Hofmann
Buncombe Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Erich Hofmann
Buncombe Co.
Comment:
Photo by: John Petranka
Durham Co.
Comment: New Hope Creek Biodiversity Survey
Photo by: Lior Carlson
Orange Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93888772
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93888772
Photo by: Scott Bolick
Randolph Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Scott Bolick
Randolph Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Scott Bolick
Randolph Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/83335098
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/81123508
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500083 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500083 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500083 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500083 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500095 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Swain Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52500095 - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Scotland Co.
Comment: male, 6.8 mm; Arundinaria and herbaceous undergrowth
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Scotland Co.
Comment: male, 6.8 mm; Arundinaria and herbaceous undergrowth
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Scotland Co.
Comment: male, mm; Arundinaria and herbaceous undergrowth
Photo by: Matthew Guilin
Cabarrus Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Matthew Guilin
Cabarrus Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Matthew Guilin
Cabarrus Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Matthew Guilin
Cabarrus Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: highly reflective, hard to get photo without having the wings reflect the light. I might be wrong on the ID?
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: highly reflective, hard to get photo without having the wings reflect the light. I might be wrong on the ID?
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: uv light - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: uv light - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: attacked to lights - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: attacked to lights - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy L Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: uv light - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Randy Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Tracy S. Feldman
Wake Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Tracy S. Feldman
Wake Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: R Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: moth sheet - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: R Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: very small - unid_leafhopper
Photo by: R Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: Not sure if this is the right ID. Seems to fit.
Photo by: R Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment: Not sure if this is the right ID. Seems to fit.
Photo by: Harry Wilson
Wake Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Rob Van Epps
Mecklenburg Co.
Comment: Attracted to black light.
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger, Brian Bockhahn, Paul Scharf
Ashe Co.
Comment: brushy, forested habitat; probably a teneral
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Wake Co.
Comment: mixed hardwood forest habitat