Hoppers of North Carolina:
Spittlebugs, Leafhoppers, Treehoppers, and Planthoppers
Scientific Name: Search Common Name:
Family (Alpha):
« »
Cyrtolobus fuliginosus (Emmons, 1854) - No Common Name     MEMBRACIDAE Members: NC Records Public View


© Matthew S. Wallace- male

© Matthew S. Wallace- female

© Ken Childs- female

synonym
description Females of this species are a dark brown color with faint transverse bands across the pronotum. The head projects slightly forward, and the tegmina is strongly marked with brown, with lighter apices. The head is somewhat extended forward and is yellow, mottled with deep brown; a black spot can be found at the base of the head above each ocellus (light sensing organ). The eyes are large and brown, lighter in color than the remainder of the head. The legs and underside of the body are a yellowish color. Males resemble the females but are smaller and have a lower and more slender pronotum. The underside of the male is black, with ventral abdominal segments pallid. The legs are orange. Adult males are 5.2 mm long, while female are 6 mm. (Kopp, 1973)
distribution Eastern and Central North America, as far west as the Rock Mountains (Kopp)
abundance Seasonal distribution: 23 April-26 May (CTNC)
seasonal_occurrence
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
habitat
plant associates Quercus coccinea, Q. falcata, Q. palustris, Q. phellos, Q. stellata, Q. velutina (CTNC)
behavior To listen to the male courtship call for this genus, listen here. These courtship calls are not audible to the human ear, and the calls here are produced by recording the substrate vibrations that the treehoppers use to communicate through the plants themselves. The recorded call is then amplified so that it is now audible to human ears. Research has shown that treehoppers use vibrations to attract mates, to announce the discovery of a good feeding site, or to alert a defending mother to the approach of a predator (T.IM).
comments This species is most similar to and could be confused with Cyrtolobus discoidalis, in particular the females of both species. However, there are subtle differences in the shape and pattern of the pronotum between the two species, with the pronotum of C. fuliginosus a bit more peaked and rounded than in discoidalis. Additionally, there is a clear hyaline patch located dorsally on the sides of the pronotum above the white line (more pronounced in males) in discoidalis; this patch is absent in fuliginosus.
status [Native:] [Introduced:] [Extirpated:]
list_type [Official:] [Provisional:]
adult_id Unmistakable and widely known Identifiable from good quality photos of unworn specimens
Identifiable from photos showing undersides, or other specialized views [e.g., legs, face]
Identifiable only by close inspection of structural features or by DNA analysis NULL
nymph_id Unmistakable and widely known Identifiable from good quality photos, especially where associated with known host plants
Identifiable from close inspection of specimens or by DNA analysis
Identifiable only through rearing to adulthood NULL
G_rank
S_rank
rank_comments
tribe
subgenus

Species Photo Gallery for Cyrtolobus fuliginosus No Common Name

Photo by: Matthew S. Wallace
Out Of State Co.
Comment: female
Photo by: Matthew S. Wallace
Out Of State Co.
Comment: male
Photo by: Ken Childs
Out Of State Co.
Comment: female