Vascular Plants of North Carolina
Account for Prune-fruit Sedge - Carex corrugata   Fernald
Members of Cyperaceae:
Members of Carex with account distribution info or public map:
Google Images
Section 5 » Order Cyperales » Family Cyperaceae
Show/Hide Synonym
AuthorFernald
DistributionCoastal Plain and lower Piedmont, but absent from the Sandhills proper. The distribution in NC needs additional tweaking via annotation of similar species.

Southeastern VA and KY south to northwestern FL and TX.
AbundanceUncommon in the Coastal Plain, except absent in the Sandhills; rare in the Piedmont. Where found, plants may be common to abundant.
HabitatMoist bottomland and floodplain forests, supposedly more calcium-rich than those inhabited by C. amphibola. Data on precise habitats in NC are deficient, but definitely seems to prefer brownwater floodplains than blackwater ones. Also occurs in moist forests underlain by marl.
PhenologyFlowering and fruiting late April-June.
IdentificationVery close to C. amphibola, and both can have a crosswise crease in the perigynia (generally more often in C. corrugata). Carex corrugata has shorter perigynia (3.9-4.5 mm vs. 4.2-5 mm in C. amphibola) but broader perigynia (1.8-2.3 mm vs. 1.5-1.9 mm). Both occur in rich floodplain forests, and also overlap in the NC range; thus habitat and geography do not help to separate these two species, though this species supposedly favors somewhat more circumneutral soil (and especially where underlain by marl).
Taxonomic CommentsWeakley (2018) indicates that this species was included within C. grisea in RAB (1968); that species (strict sense) does not occur in NC, but to our north.

The genus Carex is the largest in North America, and among the largest in the world. In temperate and boreal regions, Carex is often the dominant or co-dominant ground layer in many habitats. Seeds (achenes) are valuable food for birds and small mammals, while foliage is used by birds and mammals to make nests and as food by mammals. Species of Carex often look vastly different from one another -- spikes erect vs. drooping, tiny inflorescence vs. whopping, culms leafy vs. naked, perigynia beaked vs. beakless, stems densely bunched vs. single, etc. The genus has been divided into many sections (or groups), based on shared characters; some taxonomists have suggested that these be different genera, but that proves unworkable (so far). All Carex share the feature of a perigynium (an outer covering) which completely surrounds the achene (seed). This covering may fit tightly or loosely (like a small bladder), depending on which group or species. Details of perigynia shape, ornamentation, presence and size of beak, number of striations (or veins) are all important ID features. In recent years Rob Naczi and colleagues have stressed the importance of arrangement of perigynia -- whether spiral (3+ ranks) or distichous (2-ranked) -- and have named a number of new species as well as split off some older synonyms. Therefore, RAB's (1968) key, excellent for its time, can only be used in a general way today. Members of some sections of Carex are difficult to key out (notably Ovales, Laxiflorae, Griseae); this is in part due to variation among individuals of a species, or failings of the key. FNA has drawings of most species and some species may be found in two or more places within a key, to acount for variability. New species to NC, and new to science(!), continue to be found in NC.
Other Common Name(s)None
State RankS3
Global RankG5?
State Status
US Status
USACE-agcpFACW link
USACE-empFACW link
County Map - click on a county to view source of record.
Select a source
AllHerbaria
Select an occurrence type
AllCollection_natural