Moths of North Carolina
Scientific Name:
Common Name:
Family (Alpha):
« »
View PDFSaturniidae Members:
Syssphinx Members:
8 NC Records

Syssphinx bisecta (Lintner, 1879) - Bisected Honey Locust Moth



view caption

view caption
Taxonomy
Superfamily: Bombycoidea Family: SaturniidaeSubfamily: CaratocaminaeP3 Number: 890023.00 MONA Number: 7712.00 MONA Synonym: Sphingicampa bisecta
Comments: One of two species in this genus found in our area (six others occur in the western US -- Tuskes et al., 1996)
Identification
Field Guide Descriptions: Covell (1984); Beadle and Leckie (2012; as Syssphinx bisecta)Online Photographs: MPG, BugGuide, GBIF, BOLDTechnical Description, Adults: Forbes (1923), Ferguson (1971), Tuskes et al. (1996)Technical Description, Immature Stages: Forbes (1923), Ferguson (1971), Covell (1984), Tuskes et al. (1996), Wagner (2005)                                                                                 
Adult Markings: The yellow- or reddish-orange color, brown speckling, and two-toned forewings are shared with Sphingicampa bicolor and Anisota stigma and senatoria. It is usually easy to distinguish from those species, however, by its fine, dark lines, which are more diffuse and brown in the others. The postmedian also distinctively runs a straight course from the inner margin to the apex of the wing (or close to it), whereas in the other species it tends to be more curved and ending at the costal margin short of the apex.
Wingspan: 55-75 mm (Forbes, 1923)
Adult ID Requirements: Identifiable from good quality photos of unworn specimens.
Immatures and Development: The large green larvae are likely to be confused only with those of S. bicolor, which often are found on the same host plants. Mature instar bisecta can be distinguished based on their possession of green thoracic and abdominal horns, which are red-tipped in bicolor, and by a black-and-white lateral stripe, which is red-and-white in bicolor (Tuskes et al., 1996; Wagner, 2005). Ferguson (1971), however, observed a significant amount of individual variation in these traits. Pupation occurs in the soil.
Larvae ID Requirements: Identifiable from good quality photos, especially where associated with known host plants.
Distribution in North Carolina
Distribution: Known in North Carolina only from a single population located along the Deep River near Goldston. As late as 1971, Ferguson knew of no records for this species east of the Appalachians and Tuskes et al. (1996) knew of only two populations subsequently discovered in Georgia and South Carolina. Although Tuskes et al. speculated based on those discoveries that bisecta occurs at least sporadically east of the mountains, the Deep River population -- located close to the Fall-line -- appears to be remarkably disjunct, raising many new questions about its distribution along the Atlantic Slope.
County Map: Clicking on a county returns the records for the species in that county.
Flight Dates:
 High Mountains (HM) ≥ 4,000 ft.
 Low Mountains (LM) < 4,000 ft.
 Piedmont (Pd)
 Coastal Plain (CP)

Click on graph to enlarge
Immature Dates:
 High Mountains (HM) ≥ 4,000 ft.
 Low Mountains (LM) < 4,000 ft.
 Piedmont (Pd)
 Coastal Plain (CP)

Click on graph to enlarge
Flight Comments: Bivoltine over most of its range in the Mid-west (Ferguson, 1971; Tuskes et al., 1996). All of our records, so far, are from the late summer but adults are also likely to be flying in May and June.
Habitats and Life History
Habitats: The naturalness of the habitats used by S. bicolor in North Carolina is uncertain, since neither of the two host plants recorded for this species is believed to be native here (Alan Weakley, pers. comm. to S. Hall, 2014). While it is possible that the Deep River population is associated with groves of Gleditsia planted around old homesites or escaped into pastures, the high concentration of Gleditsia-feeding moth species recorded in the vicinity of Goldston is difficult to account for based solely on random and highly infrequent colonizations from the Mid-west. A large sill of diabase occurs in that area along the Deep River floodplain and could provide a least an approximation of the calcium-rich floodplains that are some of the main habitat for Gleditsia, Gymnocarpus, and their associated moths in the Ohio and Mississippi Valleys. Whether this site actually represents a natural, relict habitat, however, needs much further investigation.
Larval Host Plants: Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) and Kentucky coffeetree (Gymnocladus dioicus) are the only recorded host plants (Ferguson, 1971; Tuskes et al., 1996; Wagner, 2005). In North Carolina, both of these trees are considered non-native introductions from the Mid-west and only Gleditsia occurs widely, if sporadically, over most of the state. - View
Observation Methods: Comes to both blacklights and business lights fairly well; Parker Backstrom has observed up to two individuals at a time on several occasions. Adults do not feed, however, so do not come to bait. Sphingicampa larvae are reported to be fluorescent and can be searched for using blacklights (Stahnke, 1972, cited in Tuskes et al., 1996).
Wikipedia
Status in North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program Status: SR
Natural Heritage Program Ranks: G5 [S1S2]
State Protection: Currently not given any protection in North Carolina and has not yet been listed as Significantly Rare by the Natural Heritage Program
Comments: With only a single known population in North Carolina, this species appears to be one of the rarest species in the state. The naturalness of the habitats used by this species still need to be assessed before its conservation status can be determined. If it makes use primarily of cultivated Gleditsia, particularly those commonly planted in parking lots, then its habitat may actually be increasing in the state. On the other hand, if it is associated with relict communities, such as mafic floodplain forests, then it could be extremely vulnerable to extirpation.

 Photo Gallery for Syssphinx bisecta - Bisected Honey Locust Moth

Photos: 11

Recorded by: David George, Larry Chen on 2023-09-14
Durham Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: David George on 2023-09-13
Durham Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: David George on 2023-09-13
Durham Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: David George on 2023-09-13
Durham Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: David George, L. M. Carlson on 2022-06-22
Caswell Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: Alicia Ballard on 2019-06-26
Alamance Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: Alicia Ballard on 2019-06-26
Alamance Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: Alicia Ballard on 2019-05-28
Alamance Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: Parker Backstrom on 2015-08-14
Chatham Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: Parker Backstrom on 2014-09-02
Chatham Co.
Comment: One of six males encountered in the Piedmont, two from Lee County, four from Chatham. I have recorded the species in Chatham/Lee at least once every year from 2009-2014 (with the exception of 2012).
Recorded by: Darryl Willis on 2011-08-13
Cabarrus Co.
Comment: