Hoppers of North Carolina:
Spittlebugs, Leafhoppers, Treehoppers, and Planthoppers
Scientific Name: Search Common Name:
Family (Alpha):
« »
Forcipata unidentified species - No Common Name     CICADELLIDAE Members: NC Records Public View


© Kyle Kittelberger- note shape of head

© Kyle Kittelberger

© Kyle Kittelberger- note yellow color

synonym Forcipata nr. loca
description Yellowish overall, with a yellow to yellow-orange head, thorax, and the basal two thirds of the wings; the tips are hyaline. Wing venation is yellow. The head noticeably projects forward. Males has forcep-like subgenital plates that are black-tipped, sometimes visible through the semi-transparent wings. The female pregenital sternite has a central produced lobe that is narrow, with notches between the central and lateral lobes broad and U-shaped. Adults are around 4 mm long. [Description for F. loca] (DeLong & Caldwell, 1936), (BG)
distribution Eastern and central North America
abundance Scattered records across the state, from the mountains and Piedmont where it can be locally common; likely abundant throughout the state.
seasonal_occurrence
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
habitat Has been found near mixed hardwood forest.
plant associates Sedges and grasses: Carex vesicaria for F. loca (per 3I), Carex leptalea for F. acclina (per 3I)
behavior Can be attracted at night with a light.
comments Forcipata refers to the male genitalia, which ends in forceps-like claspers. (BG)

F. loca is the most common and widespread member of this genus in North America. However, there are two other members of this genus that have apparently been recorded from North Carolina: F. acclina, from somewhere in the mountains near the TN border, and F. ohioensis (Hamilton, 1998). Forcipata can be a challenging genus to identify, as the species all more or less resemble one another externally, differing in male and female genitalia (more so in male). It is therefore pertinent to collect a male specimen to determine species identification of Forcipata in the state.

Below are the descriptions from DeLong & Caldwell, 1936 for the other two species, which can be compared with the desciption for F. loca above. Hamilton, 1998 has a more detailed key to differences in the subgenital plates. The subgenital plates for the following two species lack lobes or teeth before the tips, and the tips of the plates are not darkened; in loca, the plate apices are darkened and the plates are not notably larger than the valve. There are also slight but distinct differences in the female pregenital sternites among these three species.

acclina - Adults 3.2 mm long. Yellowish, the apex of the vertex is tinted with orange; the pronotum and scutellum are yellowish. The wing venation is yellow. The vertex is strongly produced. The female pregenital sternite is short and broad, with a broadly rounded central lobe; the lateral lobes are barely produced post the notches. The male subgenital plates are abruptly bent midway and curve inward, with the plates two times as long as the valve. The female pregenital sternite has a broad, rounded median lobe.

ohioensis - Adults are around 3 mm long. A narrow species, the vertex, pronotum, and scutellum are yellowish. The wings are a dull greenish color, with yellow veins. The female pregenital sternite has a central produced lobe that is narrow, rounded at the apex. Lateral lobes are two-thirds the length of the central lobe. The male subgenital plates are broad at the base, strongly curving inwards at the apices which are blunt; they are 1.5 times as long as the valve. The female pregenital sternite has a narrow, long median lobe with very concave lateral margins/incisions on either side of the lobe.

status [Native:] [Introduced:] [Extirpated:]
list_type [Official:] [Provisional:]
adult_id Unmistakable and widely known Identifiable from good quality photos of unworn specimens
Identifiable from photos showing undersides, or other specialized views [e.g., legs, face]
Identifiable only by close inspection of structural features or by DNA analysis NULL
nymph_id Unmistakable and widely known Identifiable from good quality photos, especially where associated with known host plants
Identifiable from close inspection of specimens or by DNA analysis
Identifiable only through rearing to adulthood NULL
G_rank
S_rank
rank_comments
tribe
subgenus

Species Photo Gallery for Forcipata unidentified species No Common Name

Photo by: Paul Scharf
Warren Co.
Comment: Attracted to Black Light
Photo by: Paul Scharf
Warren Co.
Comment: Attracted to Black light
Photo by: Paul Scharf
Warren Co.
Comment: Attracted to Black light
Photo by: Paul Scharf
Warren Co.
Comment: Attracted to Black Light
Photo by: Paul Scharf
Warren Co.
Comment: Attracted to Light
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Wake Co.
Comment: near mixed hardwood forest
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Wake Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Wake Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Kyle Kittelberger
Wake Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Randy L Emmitt
Orange Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33395695
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33395695
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33395695
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37048516
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37048516
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/41327184
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/41327184
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/42348626
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/42348626
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/42902810
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/47920830
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/95468363
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/95468363
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/95468363
Photo by: Lior Carlson
Orange Co.
Comment:
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/100957318
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/49267788
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140918275
Photo by: Margarita Lankford
Orange Co.
Comment: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140918273
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper
Photo by: Ted Wilcox
Watauga Co.
Comment: unid_leafhopper