Moths of North Carolina
Scientific Name:
Common Name:
Family (Alpha):
« »
View PDFPyralidae Members:
Etiella Members:
5 NC Records

Etiella zinckenella (Treitschke, 1832) - Gold-banded Etiella Moth


Taxonomy
Superfamily: Pyraloidea Family: PyralidaeSubfamily: PhycitinaeTribe: PhycitiniP3 Number: 800523.00 MONA Number: 5744.00
Identification
Field Guide Descriptions: Beadle and Leckie (2012)Online Photographs: MPG, BugGuide, iNaturalist, Google, BAMONA, GBIF, BOLDTechnical Description, Adults: Neunzig (1996)                                                                                 
Adult ID Requirements: Identifiable from good quality photos of unworn specimens.
Distribution in North Carolina
Distribution:
County Map: Clicking on a county returns the records for the species in that county.
Flight Dates:
 High Mountains (HM) ≥ 4,000 ft.
 Low Mountains (LM) < 4,000 ft.
 Piedmont (Pd)
 Coastal Plain (CP)

Click on graph to enlarge
Habitats and Life History
Habitats: Our one record comes from a site located within a large area of natural sandhills habitat. Although some of the recorded host plants for this species occur in that area, it is not clear whether this species is solely a migrant in our area or associated primarily with croplands
Larval Host Plants: Larvae feed on a wide variety of Legumes, including Astragalus, Baptisia, Crotalaria, Glycine, Lathyrus, Lupinus, Lotus, Phaseolus, Robinia, Tephrosia, Vicia, and Vigna (Robinson et al., 2010); a number of other families of plants are also used to come extent. - View
Wikipedia
Status in North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program Status:
Natural Heritage Program Ranks: GNR SNR
State Protection: Has no legal protection, although permits are required to collect it on state parks and other public lands.
Comments: This is an Old World species that is exotic in North America

 Photo Gallery for Etiella zinckenella - Gold-banded Etiella Moth

Photos: 2

Recorded by: Jim Petranka and John Petranka on 2023-05-18
Scotland Co.
Comment:
Recorded by: J.B. Sullivan on 2020-09-09
Scotland Co.
Comment: